|
Editorial: Kenya is the Odd One Out |
|
|
|
Monday, 18 January 2010 |
The World Bank predicts just over 1% GDP growth for sub-Saharan Africa in 2009. This depressing outlook is not in synch with the East African region: Even if the EAC states, one after the other, had to revise their GDP growth forecasts downwards, they are still sitting pretty – comparatively speaking: Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda expect around 5%, much better than the continental average. Even Burundi is, according to the IMF, looking at 4.5%. Just Kenya remains the odd one out: When reading the 2009/2010 budget, Finance Minister Uhuru Kenyatta forecast that GDP growth would recover gradually from 1.7% in 2008 to 3% in the current year – probably overly ambitious as the long rains had been on the dry side. Kenya can do little (apart from taking up marketing a notch) about the slump in demand for horticultural products and tourism. But once the global crisis bottoms out, there should be some recovery in demand for Kenya 's products. In the medium term, the key risk factor is still political: Government may effusively promise a lot, but gets round to doing only very little. Look at any initiative to address Kenya 's social problems like the youth work campaign, and you'll find that someone, somehow, has made off with the cash. There is a string of flashpoints leading up to the 2012 elections: The census in August, the planned referendum next year, the escalation of simmering electoral campaigns. Public frustration, poverty and growing unemployment make for a volatile mix – it is surely not accidental that carjacking and related armed robberies and kidnapping have been increasing worryingly in the recent weeks. In the meantime, Kenyatta is making nice with donors: He's already collected balance of payment support from the IMF, and is reportedly negotiating with the World Bank to increase Kenya 's borrowing to USD1bn. Of course Kenya needs to invest in infrastructure, energy and son on – but has there been any movement towards reducing corruption in public spending (telegenically returning a handful of cars doesn't count)? Or towards making the members of this government work? And work together? Does the World Bank see something that I'm missing? Just wondering. 17 July 2009
|